Other
Adel Ebrahimpour; Mohammad Razi; SM Javad Mortazavi; Mohammad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Roshanak Moradi; Farsad Biglari; Seyyed Saeed Khabiri; Mohammad Fakoor; Mohammad Ali Sazegari; Farshid Bagheri
Abstract
Background: To improve the education of orthopaedic residents and enhance patient care in the Iran's healthcare system, it is necessary to gather information about the current status of scientific, practical, and research-based education for residents.Methods: The research project initially focused on ...
Read More
Background: To improve the education of orthopaedic residents and enhance patient care in the Iran's healthcare system, it is necessary to gather information about the current status of scientific, practical, and research-based education for residents.Methods: The research project initially focused on examining the executive curriculum in 14 centers affiliated with 6 different medical universities. Subsequently, an investigation was conducted into human resources, infrastructure, operating room facilities, educational and research outcomes, as well as the regular implementation of practical examinations to evaluate the performance of residents during their residency years. All the aforementioned aspects were covered using a comprehensive questionnaire, which was distributed via the "Formafzar.com" website as a link to the heads of departments in these centers by the Iranian Orthopaedic Association. The relationship between facilities and equipment and passing the future specialized orthopaedic board examination was also evaluated.Results: Among the examined centers, only 20% adhered to the criteria of Iran educational curriculum in all aspects of human resources, education, and research.Conclusion: a regular evaluation of teaching methods used by international centers and the national curriculum is necessary for orthopaedic training centers in Iran. Additionally, regulatory systems should monitor the training process of orthopaedic residents to standardize services, equipment, and educational programs in the country.
Mohammad Mehdi Sarzaeem, MD; Mohammad Razi, MD; Farideh Najafi, MD; Mohammad Amin Najafi
Abstract
Background: The gold standard in ACL reconstructions has been the bone–patellar tendon–bone autograftfixed with interference screws. This prospective study, aimed to compare two method of fixation for BPTB grafts: press fit fixation vs. interference screw, over a 12 months follow-up interval.Methods: ...
Read More
Background: The gold standard in ACL reconstructions has been the bone–patellar tendon–bone autograftfixed with interference screws. This prospective study, aimed to compare two method of fixation for BPTB grafts: press fit fixation vs. interference screw, over a 12 months follow-up interval.Methods: In a randomized clinical trial study, 158 patients with an average age of 29.8 years were treated for torn ACL with BPTB autograft in a teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. In 82 patients press fit fixation technique, and in 76 cases an interference-screw was used. At the time of final follow-up, 71 patients in press-fit group and 65 patients in interference-screw group were evaluated in terms of return to pre-injury activity level, pain, knee stability, range of motion, IKDC score and complications.Results: In the final follow-up, 59 cases in interference screw and 55 in press-fit screw group had good-to-excellent IKDC score (p < /em>≥.05). The mean laxity assessed improved to 2.7 mm and 2.5 mm in press-fit and screw group, respectively. Regarding Lachman and pivot shift tests, there was a statistically significant improvement in the integrity of the ACL in both groups, with no significant difference (p < /em>≥.05).Conclusions: the press-fit technique is an efficient procedure. Its outcome was comparable with the interference screw group. Furthermore it has unlimited bone-to-bone healing, no need for removal of hardware, ease for revision and cost effectiveness.
Abstract
Background: The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction remains controversial. This study aimed to compare clinical results of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts and four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis grafts for ACL reconstruction over a 3 year follow-up interval.Methods: ...
Read More
Background: The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction remains controversial. This study aimed to compare clinical results of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts and four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis grafts for ACL reconstruction over a 3 year follow-up interval.Methods: In a randomized clinical trial study, 71 patients with an average age of 29 years were treated for ACL between 2008 and 2009. Forty six patients underwent reconstruction with BPTB autograft, and 41 were treated with ST autograft. In the last year of follow-up, 37 patients in patella group and 34 patients in hamstring group were evaluated in terms of return to pre-injury activity level, pain, knee stability, range of motion, IKDC score and complications.Results: At 36 month follow-up, 34 patients in BPTB and and 28 in ST group, had good-to-excellent IKDC score (p < /em>≥.05).Lachman test was graded normal, for 23 while patients in BPTB and / in ST group, (p < /em>=.043) normal pivot-shift test was present in, 29 and 15 patients, respectively (p < /em>=.038). There was no significant difference in terms of thigh circumference knee effusion, range of motion or pain. The complications rate was also similar.Conclusions: These results indicate a trend toward increased graft laxity and pivot-shift grades in patients undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft compared with patella tendon. However, the two groups had comparable results in terms of activity level, and knee function.
